Smith v. Wolf
CASE SUMMARY
Dave Smith of Phoenixville, age 59, copes with muscular dystrophy which has confined him to a wheelchair since the age of 11. Don Lambrecht has been indispensable to him. “Don’s really been my arms and legs for 25 years,” Dave says. Don, age 62, cares for Dave around-the-clock and lives rent-free in Dave’s home. “Anything that’s important, I’m there for him,” says Don. “It isn’t like a nine-to-five job where you can just go home and punch out for the shift.”
Dave and Don are proud of the close bond of friendship they’ve developed despite the long hours and intense care Dave needs. “Being friends helps,” says Don. According to Dave, “Don is really like part of my family as much as anything.”
Both say they don’t need a union stepping between them and disrupting an arrangement that’s working. Don says, “Unions don’t fit into this kind of work…it’s not practical.” Dave agrees: “Let me put it this way; we make a team that works well. To have someone else come in and say we need to do it this way for this many hours—that just doesn’t work.”
Before Dave hired Don 25 years ago, Dave had to fire a homecare worker who tried to take financial advantage of him. Now with Don, Dave directs his own care and sets terms and conditions of employment, including pay, with Don. Don is committed to caring for Dave, and the two are in all respects, friends. Don would gain nothing from joining a union to negotiate against Dave’s best interests. In fact, Dave and Don have a relationship much like that of other homecare workers and recipients. Many homecare workers are close friends or family members of the recipient whom they serve. They are not motivated by money: the annual salary for a typical homecare worker is just over $20,000.
Currently, homecare recipients like Dave can hire, fire, manage, and pay their own homecare providers. Dave took advantage of these rights 25 years ago to fire a previous attendant who was taking advantage of him financially and to hire Don as a replacement. Dave, who cannot get out of bed or answer the phone unaided, says that despite his disability, “I’ve been blessed to do much. Without [Don] here, I don’t know—I’m not sure where I’d be. I wouldn’t be able to be on my own.”
David W. Smith and Donald Lambrecht v. Governor Thomas W. Wolf, in his official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Human Services
The Fairness Center represents Dave Smith and his homecare worker, Don Lambrecht, in their challenge to Governor Wolf’s executive order “unionizing” Mr. Lambrecht and other homecare workers against Mr. Smith and other homecare recipients.
In February 2015, Governor Wolf issued an executive order that would allow unions to easily force representation on certain homecare (or “direct care”) workers who are paid through Medicaid or other state programs. Under the executive order, unions will be permitted to exact dues payments—up to $8 million annually—from these homecare workers, many of whom cannot afford to pay union dues, do not want union representation, and will receive little benefit from forced representation. Governor Wolf’s executive order is nearly identical to a 2010 executive order that then-Governor Rendell issued and that was ultimately rescinded after a court challenge.
Meanwhile, disabled and elderly homecare recipients stand to lose even more. Homecare recipients are the legal employers of their homecare workers targeted by the executive order; they have the authority to hire, train, manage, pay, and fire their homecare workers. In other words, the unionization of homecare workers organizes workers against the homecare recipients that they serve. Unions will take away homecare recipients’ authority as employers.
Mr. Smith and Mr. Lambrecht are first asking the court to stop Governor Wolf and the Department of Human Services from implementing the executive order. Second, they are asking the court to declare that the executive order is an unconstitutional exercise of the Governor’s power.
On August 21, 2018, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued an order and opinion vacating the Commonwealth Court’s order and upholding Governor Wolf’s executive order.
State Supreme Court hears health care worker case
June 19, 2018 |
PA’s highest court considering governor’s appeal in home care case
November 29, 2017 | WITF
Unions vs. Home Health Care Workers in Pennsylvania
October 26, 2017 | The CATO
Pa. court overturns Gov. Wolf’s home care order
September 22, 2016 |
Judges mock Pennsylvania Gov. Wolf’s executive order
June 21, 2016 |
GOP dealt setback in Pa. labor fight
March 30, 2016 |
Big Labor trickery on display in effort to unionize home care
October 31, 2015 |
Justices Consider Wolf’s Executive-Order Powers
October 7, 2015 |
Lawsuits seek to stop Pa. from creating unofficial union for home care providers
June 7, 2015 |
Judge puts hold on agreements under Wolf care worker policy
April 23, 2015 |
Manor Twp. man challenges Wolf on home care plan: Fears rise in costs, other consequences
April 19, 2015 |
Battle Heats Up Over Unionizing of Pennsylvania Home Health Aides
April 9, 2015 |
Home care disorder: Wolf gives unions a gift at patients’ expense
April 9, 2015 |
Lawsuit Places Governor In The Back Pocket Of Organized Labor
April 8, 2015 |
Homecare Worker, Patient Challenge Wolf’s Order That Paves Way For Unionization
April 8, 2015 |
Lawsuit claims ‘union money grab’ through Pennsylvania Gov. Wolf order
April 7, 2015 |
Press Releases
Homecare Worker Fights $21 Million Union Money Grab Ordered by Wolf
September 2, 2015
Lawmakers Challenge Wolf Over Homecare Order at Pa. Supreme Court
October 7, 2015
Lawmaker Intervention Denied
March 29, 2016
Judges Shred Governor’s Defense
June 8, 2016
Court Rules Wolf’s Homecare Executive Order Illegal
September 22, 2016
Wolf Persists in Targeting Homecare Workers as Favor to Union Donors
October 25, 2016
Wolf Flouts Court, Funnels $1.25 Million in Human Services Funds to SEIU
July 14, 2017
Wolf Forced to Halt Latest Union-Friendly Homecare Scheme
October 10, 2017
Wolf’s Homecare Unionization Scheme Heads to Pa. Supreme Court
November 21, 2017
Wolf’s Homecare Unionization Scheme Heads to Pa. Supreme Court Tomorrow
November 27, 2017
Pa. Supreme Court Grants Wolf’s Wish, Allows Union to Invade Homecare System
August 21, 2018
Court Documents
Petitioners’ Application for Preliminary Injunction
April 6, 2015
Petitioners’ Petition for Review
April 6, 2015
Respondents’ Answer & New Matter to Application for Preliminary Injunction
April 20, 2015
Pa. Senate Majority Caucus’s Application for Intervention
April 21, 2015
Commonwealth Court Order Denying Intervention
June 3, 2015
Petitioners’ Application for Summary Relief
June 17, 2015
Appellees’ Brief on Intervention
March 1, 2016
Pa. Supreme Court Opinion Denying Intervention
March 29, 2016
Commonwealth Court Order on Application for Preliminary Injunction
March 29, 2016
Appellants’ Brief
January 17, 2017
Appellees’ Brief
March 27, 2017
Center for the American Experiment Amicus Brief
March 27, 2017
National Federation of Independent Business Amicus Brief
March 27, 2017
National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation Amicus Brief
March 27, 2017
Joseph Scarnati & Michael Turzai Amicus Brief
March 27, 2017
Petitioners’ Application for Enforcement
July 14, 2017
Joint Stipulations
October 9, 2017
Pa. Supreme Court Opinion Vacating Commonwealth Court Order & Remanding
August 21, 2018